Survival Prediction Model



Since 1983, The KIP Company has been involved with products used in heterogeneous and homogeneous catalytic processing. Since 1989, The KIP Company has supplied ceramic Catalyst Bed Supports (also called balls, pellets, or "inerts") used in hydrotreaters, reformers and other fixed-bed catalytic units in petroleum refining, petrochemical processing and various chemical reactions.

During the last 20 years, I have seen more than one failure in a heterogeneous catalyst bed (such as a reformer pretreater or hydrockracker) which was caused by failure of the so-called 'inert bed support', not by the catalyst itself.

When Catalyst Bed Supports degrade in heterogeneous catalytic operations, it splits into shards and/or powders, sometimes in sounding like small explosions in the unit. One operator reported the sounds were like someone shooting a shotgun at the unit. The resulting increase in pressure drop almost always costs more than $0.5 million per event.

Since 1992, we have been conducting autopsies of Catalyst Bed Support unloaded from commercial operating units to learn the mechanism of degradation. Many units experienced no problems during their on-line time. Some Catalyst Bed Support failures were discovered during on-line operations, while other failures were only observed when the unit was turned around.

This study is complicated by the fact that retained fresh samples are not normally kept by the operating company.

The testing included standard tests by independent laboratories using ASTM methods. By analyzing this and additional data, The KIP Company has evolved a survival prediction model for low-alumina Catalyst Bed Supports. This model is proprietary and is expressed graphically in this chart.

The KIP Company used this model to analyze for a pressure drop problem in five units in 1998. The model accurately identified which units had catalyst bed support failures.

The KIP Company is searching for additional samples to continue confirming its model, and assistance in continuing this work.

The following charts are included in the model:

Attrition
Bulk density
Crush Strength
Pore size distribution
Silica alumina percentages
Secondary chemical percentages
Temperatures of used Catalyst Bed Supports
Pressures of used Catalyst Bed Supports


Return to Main Page
Testing Services



October 1994, October 2000